Washington Commanders vs Chargers Match Player Stats: In-Depth Analysis

The Washington Commanders faced the Los Angeles Chargers in a Week 5 NFL matchup on October 5, 2025, at SoFi Stadium. This game showcased strong defensive plays and key offensive drives that shaped the outcome. Fans searching for Washington Commanders vs Chargers match player stats will find a full breakdown here, covering individual performances across all positions. The Commanders overcame an early deficit to secure a convincing win, highlighting their growth under new strategies. This post offers a step-by-step look at stats, helping readers understand what drove the result. With detailed numbers from passing to defense, it goes beyond basic recaps to provide useful insights for fans and analysts alike.

Game Overview

Final Score and Key Moments

The final score was Washington Commanders 27, Los Angeles Chargers 10. The Chargers started strong, scoring first with a touchdown pass from Justin Herbert to Ladd McConkey and adding a field goal to lead 10-0 after the first quarter. But the Commanders turned things around in the second quarter. Jacory Croskey-Merritt scored on a 15-yard rush, and Matt Gay kicked a field goal to tie it at 10-10 by halftime. In the third quarter, Croskey-Merritt added another touchdown run, and Gay hit another field goal for a 20-10 lead. The fourth quarter sealed it with a touchdown pass from Jayden Daniels to Deebo Samuel. Key moments included two turnovers by the Chargers and Washington’s ability to control the clock with long drives.

Team Stats Comparison

Washington outgained Los Angeles with 389 total yards to 336. The Commanders had 22 first downs compared to the Chargers’ 18, and they forced two turnovers while committing just one. In rushing, Washington dominated with 163 yards at 5.8 yards per carry, while Los Angeles managed 155 yards at 5.7 per carry. Passing yards favored Washington at 226 net to the Chargers’ 181. Time of possession was close, but Washington’s defense sacked Herbert five times, disrupting their rhythm. Penalties were low for both, but the Commanders’ efficiency on third downs (45% conversion) helped sustain drives. This comparison shows Washington’s balanced attack overpowered the Chargers’ early momentum.

Washington Commanders Player Stats

Passing Stats

Jayden Daniels led the Commanders’ passing game, completing 15 of 26 attempts for 231 yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions. His average was 8.9 yards per attempt, with a quarterback rating of 100.0. Daniels faced one sack for a loss of five yards but showed poise under pressure, which was minimal at just 3.1% of dropbacks. His average depth of target was 10.5 yards, indicating a mix of short and deep throws. This performance marked his best of the season, with a 71.8 QBR ranking ninth in the league for Week 5. Daniels’ accuracy helped convert key third downs, keeping drives alive against a tough Chargers secondary.

Rushing Stats

Jacory Croskey-Merritt starred in the rushing attack, carrying the ball 14 times for 111 yards and two touchdowns, averaging 7.9 yards per carry. His longest run was 27 yards, and he forced three missed tackles while gaining 2.64 yards before contact per attempt. Daniels added 39 yards on eight carries, averaging 4.9 yards, providing a dual-threat element. Chris Rodriguez Jr. had five carries for seven yards, and Jeremy McNichols gained six on one attempt. The team’s 163 rushing yards came from 28 carries, with a 56.9% success rate overall. This ground game wore down the Chargers’ defense, opening up play-action passes and controlling the pace.

Receiving Stats

Deebo Samuel was the top receiver, catching eight of 11 targets for 96 yards and one touchdown, averaging 12.0 yards per catch. His longest reception was 22 yards, and he led with 42 yards after catch, forcing three missed tackles. Luke McCaffrey had one catch for 50 yards on two targets, showing big-play potential. Croskey-Merritt added two receptions for 39 yards, and Jaylin Lane caught one for 16. Other contributors included Jeremy McNichols (12 yards), John Bates (nine), and Tay Martin (nine). The group totaled 15 receptions for 231 yards, with a 15.4 average. Samuel’s versatility as a route runner and after-catch threat was crucial in stretching the field.

Will You Check This Article: From Blog PlayBattleSquare: Your Guide to Gaming Tips and Fun

Defensive Stats

Bobby Wagner anchored the defense with 14 total tackles, eight solo, and one quarterback hit. Mike Sainristil had nine tackles, seven solo, two passes defended, and one interception. Quan Martin also had nine tackles. Edge rushers shone: Dorance Armstrong with two sacks, Von Miller with 1.5, and Jer’Zhan Newton with one. The unit recorded five sacks, six tackles for loss, and four passes defended, holding the Chargers to 181 passing yards and a 38.5% success rate. Their pressure rate disrupted Herbert, leading to two turnovers, including a fumble recovery by Marshon Lattimore. This effort ranked fourth in EPA per play at -0.157.

Special Teams Stats

Matt Gay was perfect, making both field goals from 29 and 36 yards, plus three extra points for nine points total. Luke McCaffrey handled kick returns, averaging 30.7 yards on three for 92 total, with a long of 40. Tress Way punted twice for 101 yards, averaging 50.5, with one inside the 20. Jaylin Lane had one fair catch on punt returns. Coverage units limited returns, with tackles from Tyler Owens, Antonio Hamilton Sr., Tay Martin, and others. No major penalties hurt the group, and their solid play helped field position, contributing to the win by pinning the Chargers deep at times.

Los Angeles Chargers Player Stats

Passing Stats

Justin Herbert completed 22 of 29 passes for 166 yards, one touchdown, one interception, and a 86.3 rating. He averaged 5.7 yards per attempt but took four sacks for 24 yards lost. Trey Lance added three of four for 44 yards in relief, with one sack. The team totaled 25 of 33 for 181 net yards, one touchdown, and one pick. Herbert’s early success faded under pressure, with five total sacks disrupting timing. His QBR was 51.7, reflecting struggles against Washington’s pass rush. This performance highlighted protection issues that limited deep throws.

Rushing Stats

Omarion Hampton led with 12 carries for 44 yards, averaging 3.7, with a long of eight. Herbert scrambled for 60 yards on four attempts, averaging 15.0, including a 41-yard run. Kimani Vidal had four for 18, Hassan Haskins five for 13, Trey Lance one for 11, and Quentin Johnston one for nine. The team rushed 27 times for 155 yards at 5.7 average, no touchdowns. Early runs set up plays, but inconsistency and Washington’s front seven stuffed lanes later. Herbert’s mobility provided sparks, but overall, the ground game couldn’t sustain drives against a stout defense.

Receiving Stats

Keenan Allen caught five of nine targets for 58 yards, averaging 11.6, with a long of 29. Ladd McConkey had five of seven for 39 yards and one touchdown. Quentin Johnston grabbed four for 40, Tyler Conklin two for 30, and Omarion Hampton six for 26 on screens. Others included Oronde Gadsden (14 yards), Hassan Haskins (two), and Kimani Vidal (one). The group totaled 25 catches for 210 yards at 8.4 average. Allen’s reliability was key early, but drops and coverage limited big gains. Hampton’s checkdowns showed a conservative approach under duress.

Defensive Stats

Troy Dye led with 11 tackles, seven solo, and three tackles for loss. Daiyan Henley had eight tackles, Elijah Molden five, and Justin Eboigbe four with one sack. Tarheeb Still added four tackles and two passes defended. The unit had one sack, six tackles for loss, and four passes defended but allowed 389 yards. They forced one turnover via fumble recovery by Teair Tart. Early stops worked, but they tired against Washington’s run game, missing tackles and allowing explosive plays. Pressure was limited to one sack, letting Daniels operate cleanly.

Special Teams Stats

Cameron Dicker made his only field goal from 55 yards and one extra point. Punt and kick returns weren’t standout, with no major gains noted. The punter averaged well, but coverage allowed McCaffrey’s 30.7-yard average on kickoffs. No penalties hurt them here, but field position battles favored Washington. Dicker’s long kick kept them in it early, but overall, special teams didn’t create momentum shifts. This area was steady but not game-changing against the Commanders’ efficient units.

Standout Performances

Jacory Croskey-Merritt emerged as a star for the Commanders, rushing for 111 yards and two scores while adding 39 receiving yards. His 7.9 yards per carry and forced missed tackles broke the game open. Deebo Samuel’s 96 yards and touchdown reception showcased his all-around skills. On defense, Dorance Armstrong’s two sacks pressured Herbert constantly. For the Chargers, Justin Herbert’s 60 rushing yards provided highlights, but his passing was contained. Ladd McConkey’s touchdown catch was a bright spot. These players’ efforts defined the match, with Croskey-Merritt’s breakout earning him player of the game nods in many recaps.

Analysis and Insights

In reviewing Washington Commanders vs Chargers match player stats, the Commanders’ defense stands out for limiting Herbert to under 200 yards and forcing errors. Their pass rush generated a 15% pressure rate from edges like Miller and Armstrong. Offensively, balanced play-calling exploited mismatches, with 163 rush yards easing pressure on Daniels. The Chargers struggled with protection, allowing five sacks that stalled drives. Their run game averaged well but lacked touchdowns. Turnovers were costly, with two versus Washington’s one. Future games could see Washington build on this momentum, while Los Angeles needs line improvements. This matchup teaches the value of trench control in close contests.

The Washington Commanders vs Chargers match player stats reveal a tale of resilience and execution. Washington’s 27 unanswered points after trailing show team depth. Fans can use these details to track player trends, like Daniels’ improving QBR or Croskey-Merritt’s efficiency. This guide covers every angle, from individual metrics to team impacts, ensuring readers grasp the full picture without gaps.